Skip to main content

About your Search

20130301
20130331
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
CSPAN
Mar 10, 2013 4:05am EDT
other words, behavioral change would be the ultimate goal, in addition to any recovery? >> absolutely. we've not quantify the fact the chicken save money over the long haul by putting internal controls and to place. >> with that, we go to mr. jordan, and returning star is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. some members of the house and senate have said that mr. lahood's dire warning is not backed up with data. this suggests that the faa could instead cut $500 million on consultants and $200 million on expenses of travel. do you think that is something we could focus on? >> we cannot achieve the savings that way, and i will be glad to document why. that refers point out what the sequester means. two-thirds -- i am sorry, three quarters. 74% or department is exempt from the sequestered. which means the sequestration cut fall disproportionately on a portion of the department, primarily the federal aviation and attrition. >> my question is, do you spend -- does the faa part of your budget been $500 million on consultants and $200 million on supplies and travel? >> war
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1